🔗 Share this article

Established parties in power are increasingly allowing the radical right to set the political agenda, as per a new research carried out in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Academics discovered that this phenomenon has inadvertently benefited radical parties by validating their viewpoints and disseminating them more widely.

Analysis Based on Two Decades of News Coverage

The results, released in the academic journal on political studies, relied on an computerized content review of over 520,000 news pieces from six national publications.

Capital-based scholars observed that as the far right moved from fringe issues in the 1990s era to core themes like assimilation and immigration, established political groups increasingly adapted their communication in response.

This adjustment boosted the dissemination of these ideas and signaled to voters that such stances were legitimate.

Consequences for Democratic Systems

"Public discourse by established parties plays a central role in the electoral success of the far right," stated a expert in political behavior participating in the research.

"This factor has been underestimated," she noted.

The impact was evident even when conventional parties were condemning the radical faction. "You're still giving them attention," the researcher remarked. "The main point is that because we live in such a struggle for visibility, this attention is crucial."

Normalisation Effect Throughout Europe

While the study was focused on Germany, this mainstreaming phenomenon is probable to affect countries throughout the European continent.

"You see this a lot in European news outlets," said another co-author. "The far right makes a statement and everyone starts talking about it for several days."

"Although you're opposing it, you're echoing it," he added.

Hardening of Political Rhetoric

At certain points, leaders have also hardened their discourse to align with that of the far right.

In a recently published interview, a former German chancellor advocated widespread deportations and pushed for them to happen "more often and faster."

Similar instances can be found across the continent, as politicians from nations ranging from the UK to France embrace the rhetoric of the radical right, especially on migration.

This has created an feedback loop that was inconceivable a ten years prior.

Central Problem: Who Dictates the Agenda?

"{If you're a centrist party and you are discussing cultural issues – immigration, assimilation – in a way that is dictated by the rhythm of the radical right, that's the essence of narrative control," clarified a researcher.

Some political parties have gone one step further, attempting to emulate the hardline agenda of the far right, despite studies suggests that doing so leads the electorate to cast their ballot for the radical faction.

Progressive Influence and Public Perception

The extent of data collected showed that the influence of far-right parties had been progressive and had increased over time.

"Public perception doesn't change from one day to another," stated a researcher. "But if you hear this pessimistic narrative around immigration frequently, and it is being spread not only by radical groups but also, for instance, by established political organizations, then of course this storyline gains more traction."

Requirement for Established Groups to Carve Out Their Own Narratives

The study highlighted the need for mainstream political parties to carve out their distinct discourses, particularly on subjects such as immigration and integration, instead of constantly trailing after the radical right.

"It's like a dance," said one author. "If the conductor is far-right and you're reacting to it, you lose the ability to choose which music should be playing."